High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

The Government Can’t Revoke a Visa Because of an Op-ed

by April 30, 2025
April 30, 2025

Thomas A. Berry

rumeysa Ozturk

Rumeysa Ozturk (Screenshot: as​.tufts​.edu)

Rumeysa Ozturk is a graduate student at Tufts University in Massachusetts. Ozturk is a Turkish citizen who was living in the United States on a student visa. On March 25, Ozturk was approached and surrounded by six plainclothes officers, stripped of her cellphone and backpack, handcuffed, and taken into custody in an unmarked vehicle. Unbeknownst to her, the United States had revoked her visa just days earlier. Ozturk was transferred to Vermont and then Louisiana, where she remains in custody.

A provision of federal immigration law grants the Secretary of State the authority to deport an alien if the secretary “has reasonable ground to believe” that the alien’s “presence or activities in the United States … would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” The government cited this provision in revoking Ozturk’s visa, without specifying why it believed her presence would have adverse foreign policy consequences.

Evidence indicates that Ozturk’s visa was revoked solely on the basis of an op-ed she co-authored for a student newspaper. That op-ed criticized the Tufts University administration for dismissing certain student government resolutions. The op-ed argued that these resolutions would have held “Israel accountable for clear violations of international law” in Palestine.

Ozturk has petitioned a federal court to order her released, and Cato has joined a broad coalition of groups, led by FIRE, to file an amicus brief supporting that petition. In our brief, we explain that noncitizens residing in the United States have the same First Amendment rights as citizens. The Supreme Court said as much in Bridges v. Wixon (1945), where the Court remarked that “freedom of speech and of the press is accorded aliens residing in this country.” The Supreme Court also affirmed this principle in Bridges v. California (1941), a case in which the Court invalidated the criminal convictions of several people, including a non-citizen, because those convictions violated the First Amendment.

As our brief further explains, Ozturk’s op-ed was protected speech. The government has not alleged that Ozturk was providing material support to terrorists, nor has it alleged that her op-ed fell into any other exception to the First Amendment (such as insurrectionary speech). If a citizen were punished for the same commentary, such punishment would be a blatant First Amendment violation. Ms. Ozturk’s punishment is no different.

Finally, our brief emphasizes that Ozturk’s detention is irreconcilable with the Supreme Court’s admonition that colleges and their “surrounding environs” are “peculiarly the marketplace of ideas.” There are more than a million international students studying at America’s universities. None of them will feel safe criticizing the American government—in class, scholarship, or on their own time—if a current or future Secretary of State may, at his unreviewable discretion, arrest and detain them based on their spoken or written advocacy.

As Justice Frank Murphy wrote in a concurrence in the Wixon case, the freedom of foreign nationals lawfully residing in the United States is “not dependent upon their conformity to the popular notions of the moment,” because the First Amendment “belongs to them as well as to all citizens.” 

Ozturk’s detention and the revocation of her visa violate the First Amendment, and the courts should order her released.

previous post
JUST IN: Obama Judge Orders IMMEDIATE Release of Pro-Hamas Student Who Was Detained at His Naturalization Interview – Student Sends a Mocking Message to Trump (VIDEO)
next post
ABLECHILD: Tennessee Sets National Precedent with Passage of AbleChild Bill Requiring Psychotropic Drug Testing in Mass Shooter Cases

You may also like

Can the White House Denaturalize Domestic Opponents?

July 25, 2025

An Updated Interview with George Selgin on Free...

July 25, 2025

Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to...

July 25, 2025

Friday Feature: Edefy, “Pod Schooling Made Simple”

July 25, 2025

Yiwu: China’s Free-Market City

July 25, 2025

Man Admits to Medicaid Fraud—That’s Not the Worst...

July 25, 2025

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience

July 24, 2025

Fifteen Years of Dodd-Frank: A Legacy of Missed...

July 23, 2025

July 30 Event: Senators Tim Kaine and Rand...

July 23, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Can the White House Denaturalize Domestic Opponents?

    July 25, 2025
  • An Updated Interview with George Selgin on Free Banking and Bitcoin

    July 25, 2025
  • Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to Infinity

    July 25, 2025
  • Friday Feature: Edefy, “Pod Schooling Made Simple”

    July 25, 2025
  • Yiwu: China’s Free-Market City

    July 25, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 highyieldmarkets.com | All Rights Reserved

High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick