High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Free Markets Did Not Fail the Middle Class

by May 2, 2025
May 2, 2025

Norbert Michel and Jerome Famularo

middle class

Today’s populists peddle two narratives to support their agenda. The first one is that the middle class suffered broad income stagnation for the past 50 years. The second one is that policymakers’ blind devotion to free markets—especially through free trade—decimated the US manufacturing sector, “hollowing out” the middle class by causing the alleged income stagnation.

The problem is that both stories are wrong.

The second populist narrative, that policymakers’ blind devotion to free markets decimated US manufacturing, is a broad topic that we won’t delve into here. But it’s covered in this new book, Crushing Capitalism, and we’ll go deeper in this upcoming Cato event.

Still, the relevance of the second narrative relies on the underlying assumption of income stagnation. We’ve previously written about how the evidence contradicts the income stagnation story, and many other scholars have as well. We’ve also provided concrete examples of how populists cherry-pick data to “prove” that income growth stagnated, and devoted a full chapter to debunking the stagnation story in this new book. 

Here’s just one more example of how wrong the populists’ income stagnation story is. Real median household income, for all American households, increased 73 percent from 1968 to 2024. That’s not stagnation. Interestingly, that figure is biased downward because of changing household characteristics, such as smaller families, an aging population, and more single folks.

As Figure 1 shows, real median income for married couples with children increased by 132 percent from 1968 to 2024. That’s pretty much the polar opposite of stagnation.

Given all the negative rhetoric, it’s hard to believe that living standards have been increasing broadly for decades. But it’s true, life has become more affordable.

middle class

For instance, as we’ve written numerous times, it’s not true that housing has become radically unaffordable, though that’s one of the more persistent myths. It’s difficult to see because the housing that people buy is very different than it was 50 years ago, and a more diverse set of households now pays for housing.

One way to highlight these differences is to look at the median home price as a percentage of income by household type. As Figure 2 shows, when we consider all households, the unaffordability problem looks much worse than when we consider only the income of those married with children. Again, looking at all households will understate income gains, since the population is aging and more people are choosing to live alone, so it is useful to narrow the focus to married couples with children.

As we showed back in December (see Figure 5), adjusting for both home and household size changes shows that housing has actually become slightly more affordable. Not to mention that homes have vastly more amenities nowadays than they used to, such as central air and garages, which are not factored into this adjustment.

For a more in-depth factual deconstruction of these populist narratives, please check out the book and join our live discussion on May 8, with our Cato colleague Adam Michel and the Washington Post’s Megan McArdle.

Crushing Capitalism 16x9

previous post
ICE Arrests Illegal Immigrant Who Killed 13-Year-Old Girl in Texas After 10 Years at Large
next post
Friday Feature: One Stone

You may also like

Shifts, Not Shocks: Rethinking Rust Belt Decline

May 23, 2025

Friday Feature: LUMIN Schools

May 23, 2025

Tariffs on Imports from China Are Still Too...

May 23, 2025

Financial Surveillance Is Expanding—But So Is the Resistance

May 23, 2025

Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade...

May 23, 2025

The Best Way to Expand Naloxone Access? Clear...

May 22, 2025

Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit,...

May 22, 2025

Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

May 22, 2025

Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve...

May 22, 2025

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But...

May 22, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Shifts, Not Shocks: Rethinking Rust Belt Decline

    May 23, 2025
  • Friday Feature: LUMIN Schools

    May 23, 2025
  • Tariffs on Imports from China Are Still Too High

    May 23, 2025
  • Financial Surveillance Is Expanding—But So Is the Resistance

    May 23, 2025
  • Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade Increases the Variety and Lowers the Price of Dolls and Almost All Else We Buy

    May 23, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 highyieldmarkets.com | All Rights Reserved

High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick