High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025

Neal McCluskey

In a decision that surprised me in its rapidity, but not its outcome, the Supreme Court deadlocked four to four, leaving in place an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision against the creation of a Roman Catholic cyber charter school. The tie vote was possible because Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case, likely because she is close friends with Nicole Stelle Garnett, the University of Notre Dame law professor who was instrumental in moving the case forward. While the case should elicit conflicted emotions for anyone who desires freedom and equality in education, the charter school going down was probably the right outcome.

Why right? Petitioners were correct that a charter excluding religious options, but at least theoretically allowing all others, discriminates against religious Americans. But chartering is too government-entangling a way to fix the problem. A charter school is a public school typically approved to exist by a government entity such as a state board, and that is too much government control. Chief Justice John Roberts, who was the likely conservative swing vote, addressed that concern directly in oral arguments, saying, “This does strike me as a much more comprehensive involvement” than school choice programs that allow families to use public funds at private schools, the subjects of much of the precedent cited by petitioners.

It is inherently dangerous to put the government in the position to declare, “This proposed religious school is OK, and this one is not.”

Because the decision was a tie, it sets no legal precedent, but it does send a message: Charter schooling is likely not the right way, legally, to address very real discrimination against religion by our public education system. The solution, as I have argued and as precedent points to, is private school choice, at least constitutionally required for religious families.

previous post
Fulton Commissioners Reject Republicans But Approve Democrats for Election Board in Violation of Their Own Law
next post
Supreme Court Upholds Block on Nation’s First Religious Charter School in 4-4 Vote – Amy Coney Barrett Recuses

You may also like

Can the White House Denaturalize Domestic Opponents?

July 25, 2025

An Updated Interview with George Selgin on Free...

July 25, 2025

Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to...

July 25, 2025

Friday Feature: Edefy, “Pod Schooling Made Simple”

July 25, 2025

Yiwu: China’s Free-Market City

July 25, 2025

Man Admits to Medicaid Fraud—That’s Not the Worst...

July 25, 2025

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience

July 24, 2025

Fifteen Years of Dodd-Frank: A Legacy of Missed...

July 23, 2025

July 30 Event: Senators Tim Kaine and Rand...

July 23, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Can the White House Denaturalize Domestic Opponents?

    July 25, 2025
  • An Updated Interview with George Selgin on Free Banking and Bitcoin

    July 25, 2025
  • Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to Infinity

    July 25, 2025
  • Friday Feature: Edefy, “Pod Schooling Made Simple”

    July 25, 2025
  • Yiwu: China’s Free-Market City

    July 25, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 highyieldmarkets.com | All Rights Reserved

High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick