This article originally appeared on rifttv.com and was republished with permission.
In a world where truth is buried under layers of corporate and government agendas, a chilling revelation emerges: the LED light mandate is no innocent push for energy efficiency. It’s a calculated move to bathe Americans in artificial blue light, a silent weapon rewiring our brains, bodies, and society itself.
From plummeting birth rates to fractured families, from political extremism to media-fueled chaos, the pervasive glow of blue light is not just a health hazard—it’s a tool of control.
Neurosurgeon Dr. Jack Kruse, in an explosive interview with Rift TV host Elijah Schaffer, pulls back the curtain on this insidious plot, exposing how the government and media are complicit in a scheme to manipulate the public’s biology and behavior.
In 2007, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act, mandating a phase-out of incandescent light bulbs in favor of energy-efficient alternatives like LEDs.
Championed as a step toward “sustainability,” the transition gained momentum under the Obama administration, with the Department of Energy enforcing stricter efficiency standards.
By 2028, under Biden administration rules, incandescent bulbs will be effectively banned, replaced by LEDs that emit high levels of blue light.
The Department of Energy touts this as a triumph for reducing carbon emissions, claiming LEDs use up to 80% less energy. But what’s left unsaid is the cost to human health and societal stability.
Blue light, with wavelengths between 400 and 500 nanometers, mimics the spectrum of natural daylight but lacks the balance of sunlight’s full spectrum. Studies from institutions like Harvard Medical School have linked prolonged exposure to blue light—especially at night—to disrupted circadian rhythms, suppressed melatonin production, and increased risks of obesity, diabetes, and mood disorders.
Yet, the government’s push for LEDs ignores these findings, prioritizing corporate interests and green optics over public well-being.
Kruse, a board-certified neurosurgeon, warns this is no accident but a deliberate strategy to keep Americans sick, infertile, and divided.
He points to the rise of the “incel,” involuntary celibate, movement, particularly among young men with far-right political leanings, as a symptom of blue light toxicity.
“What if I was to tell you that sexual identity, gender, and sexual choice is also on a spectrum?” Kruse said, explaining that blue light disrupts non-visual photoreceptors, particularly vitamin A (retinol), which affects sleep and hormonal pathways. “It moves your epigenetics back and forth. It’s mostly methylation and histone modification on DNA.”
This epigenetic shift, Kruse claims, suppresses testosterone and oxytocin, hormones critical for bonding, reproduction, and social engagement. The result? A generation of men disinterested in relationships or procreation, proudly embracing asexuality under purple and black flags—colors Kruse notes ironically align with ultraviolet light and semiconductor properties tied to light toxicity.
“I don’t think the people in that community are smart enough to know that purple and black was really wise to pick,” he remarked, hinting at a deeper, almost orchestrated influence.
This hormonal disruption, Kruse argues, dampens activism by sapping the drive for collective action.
“When you’re in a committed relationship with a woman, she has a duty to tell you if you’re performing or not performing,” he said, linking sexual dysfunction to broader societal apathy.
By weakening family units and reducing birth rates, blue light exposure aligns with what Kruse sees as a technocratic agenda to control population growth and suppress resistance.
“The government right now wants you sick, wants you infertile, because what does that do? It actually gives them more power over us,” he warned.
Kruse’s most explosive claim is that the media and entertainment industries, saturated with blue-light-emitting screens, are complicit in this manipulation.
From smartphones to TVs to LED-lit studios, the constant exposure keeps viewers in a state of heightened stress and reduced cognitive clarity.
“What does blue light do to blood glucose and insulin? Raises both of them. You don’t have to eat a cheesecake,” Kruse explained, noting that this metabolic stress mimics a fight-or-flight response, keeping audiences agitated and distracted.
This environment, he argues, fuels divisive political narratives and sensationalized content, as seen in what Schaffer called the “telenovelas of politics.”
Kruse agreed: “It’s bullshit. It’s like, fucking these are soap operas. I know it gets eyeball clicks, but you know why? Because those are retards that are all…blue lit.”
By keeping audiences hooked on divisive, emotionally charged media, the industry ensures they remain too fatigued and polarized to question the larger agenda.
Kruse pointed to the NFL’s adoption of rainbow-colored campaigns as evidence of catering to shifting social norms influenced by light-induced hormonal changes, noting, “There’s a lot of gays that like football… that’s the evidence that that’s happening here.
‘He also criticized the media’s role in normalizing distraction over substance, citing figures like Candace Owens who, he claims, focus on drama rather than addressing root causes like abortion’s impact on black communities.
“The liberals, they’re okay about killing black babies… we’ve killed more black babies in abortion clinics than we did anything in slavery,” Kruse said, accusing the media of ignoring these truths to maintain control.
Kruse’s solution is radical yet simple: reject the blue light agenda by embracing natural sunlight and minimizing artificial light exposure. He advocates for incandescent bulbs, blue-blocking glasses, and red-light therapy, urging Schaffer to investigate the LED mandate’s origins.
“I need you as the journalist to go after that story. We need to reverse that effect so we don’t have these lights that we go back to incandescence,” he pleaded, framing it as a fight to restore fertility, family, and freedom.
By seeing the sunrise and reducing screen time, Kruse believes individuals can reclaim their health and resist technocratic control.
Whether you buy into his theories or not, the LED mandate’s implications demand scrutiny. Why did the government push for lights that disrupt our hormones and sleep? Who benefits from a population too tired, too divided, to fight back? As Americans, we pride ourselves on questioning authority—but are we questioning enough?
The post SHOCKING: Top Neurosurgeon Exposes How LEDs Are Turning Patriots Into Passive ‘Incel’ Pawns | Elijah Schaffer appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.