A psyop could be blurring the limits between empty reports and hostile action.
The thing with Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) is that they were (and are) secret human crafts used as a psyops on populations around the globe.
The Black Vault group obtained access to CIA UFO docs from a FOIA request, and I had the opportunity to study them in detail.
Walter B. Smith director of the CIA in the early 1950s, in a memorandum for the Director of the Psychological Strategy Board, wrote: “the problems connected with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psychological warfare as well as for intelligence and operations.”
Another document in the FOIA release detailed the National Security implications stemming from the UFO phenomenon: “channels of communications are clogged by irrelevant reports; continued false claims lead to the ignoring of real indications of hostile actions; creation of a morbid national psychology in which skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority.”
Today, we are living a very similar surge in unidentified drone activity in Europe and North America – and we are not talking mere sightings.
In the last 12 months (from November 10, 2024 until today) at least 9 countries in Europe experienced airport closures or full operational shutdowns due to unidentified drone activity: Denmark (multiple airports including Copenhagen and Aalborg), Norway (Oslo), Sweden (Stockholm Arlanda), Germany (Munich multiple times), Belgium (Brussels Zaventem and Liège), Latvia (Riga), besides others with lesser confirmed disruptions, including Poland.
In North America, the United States saw brief runway closures at New York Stewart International Airport (December 2024) and airspace shutdowns over military bases like Wright-Patterson AFB.
The behavior from European governments and media suggests that a similar psyop is in play, creating a morbid national psychology in which skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical behavior.
Things have gotten so bad in Belgium that the UK, France, and Germany have jumped to provide ‘staff’ (troops?) and equipment to help Belgium counter drone incursions around sensitive facilities.
Politico reported:
“Belgium’s Defense Minister Theo Francken thanked “our British friends” for their decision to deploy an anti-drone team in Belgium, after similar moves by France and Germany were announced in recent days.
Airports in Brussels and Liège were forced to suspend flights last week after unidentified drones were spotted in their airspace, and other drones overflew the port of Antwerp recently. Even Belgium’s military bases have been targeted.”
There’s hardly any need to even write who these European governments believe to be behind these incidents: the usual suspects – Russia.
The European Commission has called these drones incursions, part of the hybrid war that Russia is conducting against the EU. Russia, of course, denies the allegations.
While it would be silly for us to speculate who’s behind all this with the limited information that we have access to, it doesn’t hurt to recall an old investigative directive: ‘Cui bono?’ (Who benefits?)
Who benefits from keeping Europe in a constant alert, upping the escalation against the Russians?
Read more:
The post UAV PANIC: A PSYOP? Unidentified Drones Over Belgium Lead to UK, France and Germany Sending Troops and Equipment to Counter the ‘Threat’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.