High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

No, It’s Not Price Controls: Trump’s Executive Order to Reduce the Prices Medicare Pays for Medicines

by May 12, 2025
May 12, 2025

Michael F. Cannon

medicaid, subsidies

Government should not purchase medicines for civilians. Period. The US Medicare and Medicaid programs illustrate why. Medicare pays significantly higher prices for medicines than other government programs. Medicaid likewise overpays for prescription drugs and has spillover effects that increase drug prices for private purchasers. These programs pay excessive prices partly because Congress largely let the pharmaceutical industry write each program’s drug-pricing rules.

Government should get out of the business of purchasing or subsidizing medicines for civilians. In other words, the price that Medicare and Medicaid should be paying for drugs is $0.00. To the extent that Trump’s executive order moves the prices Medicare pays for medicines closer to the ideal price of $0.00, it is a step in the right direction.

It is not a “price control” when the government reduces the prices Medicare pays for drugs. Price controls are coercive restraints government places on private actors. If Medicare pays less for drugs, by contrast, private actors remain free to buy and sell at whatever prices make them happy.

If Congress fears that lower Medicare prices would lead to insufficient pharmaceutical research, development, and innovation, the way to correct that market failure is to adjust the patent system. Medicare is not a drug-innovation program. Moreover, the patent system is constitutional. Medicare is not.

previous post
Ukraine and Hungary Trade Diplomatic Blows, Each Expel Two Over Espionage Accusations
next post
ICE Agents Routinely Mask Up When Seizing People—That’s Wrong

You may also like

Restructure or Repeal? What’s the Best Way to...

July 1, 2025

Ruling Against Ohio Scholarship Program Puts System Above...

July 1, 2025

Emergency Powers Are for Emergencies

July 1, 2025

CAFE Standards

June 30, 2025

Ellingburg v. United States Brief: Criminal Restitution Counts...

June 30, 2025

This Harm Reduction Innovation Is Already Saving Lives

June 30, 2025

Fifteen Minutes on ICE’s Mass Deportation Agenda

June 30, 2025

Senate Big Beautiful Bill: More Growth, More Subsidies,...

June 30, 2025

One Big Bloated Blunder: What’s Wrong with the...

June 30, 2025

Bank Secrecy Act and Capital Gains Targeted for...

June 30, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Restructure or Repeal? What’s the Best Way to Fix the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?

    July 1, 2025
  • Ruling Against Ohio Scholarship Program Puts System Above Students

    July 1, 2025
  • Emergency Powers Are for Emergencies

    July 1, 2025
  • CAFE Standards

    June 30, 2025
  • Ellingburg v. United States Brief: Criminal Restitution Counts as Criminal Punishment

    June 30, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 highyieldmarkets.com | All Rights Reserved

High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick