The 8-year-long federal lawsuit seeking to ban voting systems in the State of Georgia that store a voter’s intent on a QR code rather than human-verifiable text ended in April.
Judge Amy Totenberg issued her ruling over a year after the trial concluded, determining that “the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.”
The Gateway Pundit covered this trial from Day 1 in court, witnessing several egregious manipulations of the voting system demonstrated live and on the record in the courtroom.
University of Michigan computer science professor Dr. J. Alex Halderman successfully hacked the Dominion ICX system in court using a BIC pen in one hack and tools you can purchase on Amazon for several other hacks.
Part 3: Full Scope of Dominion ICX Hack in Federal Court is FAR Worse than Just the BIC Pen Hack
The hacks resulted in the ballots printing human-readable text that were inconsistent with the voter’s intent. In other words, if you voted for Candidate A, the hack would cause the ballot to print from the ballot marking device showing a vote for Candidate B. The QR code would also record the vote as a vote for Candidate B.
One thing is certainly clear following the decision – How on earth did this case progress for eight years, a 17-day trial, and a 14-month long lull from Judge Totenberg in rendering a decision?
BREAKING:
After an 8 year-long battle in Federal courts, spanning the two separate voting systems (Diebold and Dominion), Federal Judge Amy Totenberg has DISMISSED the Curling v Raffensperger case for “lacking jurisdiction”.
It took this judge EIGHT YEARS to determine her Court… pic.twitter.com/7Up0QzKn9y
— CannCon (@CannConActual) April 1, 2025
The Curling v. Raffensperger case has been DISMISSED after 8 long years! Judge took 14 months to write an order dismissing it on standing—a threshold issue. Unreal.https://t.co/AE0g4T9gSu pic.twitter.com/SjCXy9oMmG
— Holly Kesler (@hmkesler) April 1, 2025
But, this case is not yet over.
Last week Garland Favorito and VoterGA last week appealed the inexplicable dismissal of Curling vs. Raffensperger by far left Judge Amy Totenberg.
ATLANTA, GA, JULY 10, 2025 – VoterGA co-founder Ricardo Davis yesterday appealed an inexplicable U.S. District Court dismissal of Plaintiffs claims in the case known as Curling v. Raffensperger. The case involves the question of whether or not Georgia’s voting system is constitutionally deficient. Judge Amy Totenberg abruptly ruled on March 31, 2025, that all plaintiffs, including Davis, no longer had standing to pursue their claims.
Federal courts have made numerous rulings in the Plaintiffs’ favor over the life of the case which originated in 2017. Rulings that confirmed the Plaintiffs’ standing include:
- Totenberg’s August 15, 2019 Order;
- An 11th Circuit Court of Appeals denial on February 7, 2019, of a challenge to all Plaintiffs’ standing;
- Totenberg’s 37-page analysis confirming Plaintiffs’ standing in an October 11, 2023 order that initiated a three-week trial in January 2024.
Davis heard about the dismissal the next day and said: “I thought it was an April Fool’s joke”. He added: “But more unprecedented was the way I was prevented before and during trial from presenting my case. The court rejected my original attorney and did not allow me to call any witnesses. Even the Defendants agreed I was entitled to the attorney of my choice.”
The Davis appeal counters Totenberg’s decision that Plaintiffs’ claims were speculative and did not represent a cognizable injury to a legally protected interest with three basic arguments:
- The court erred in finding Plaintiffs no longer had standing since they had no change in status over the 7-year life of the case and standing was already determined years earlier;
- Davis presented legally cognizable injuries to justify pursuing his claims such as inaccurate election results, system malfunctions and negligence by the Defendants;
- The court abused its discretion by denying Davis the attorney of his choice, the ability to call rebuttal witnesses and previously deposed witnesses, to fully question Defendant witnesses and Plaintiffs’ experts and to designate deposition transcripts for the record.
Attorney David Oles, who argued valiantly for Davis, explained: “Ricardo Davis tried for seven years to show evidence of real problems in the Dominion Voting System. He was denied his day in court when that evidence was excluded.” Co-founder Garland Favorito, who attended trial every day as advisor to Davis, added: “It was the most judicially dishonest decision I have ever seen”.
VoterGA has four other active election cases involving Georgia’s 2020 and 2022 elections.
VoterGA is a non-partisan, 501(c)3 registered non-profit organization created by a coalition of citizens working to restore election integrity in Georgia. We advocate for independently verifiable, auditable, recount capable, transparent and tamper proof elections.
Donate to VoterGA
The post Garland Favorito and VoterGA Appeal Inexplicable Dismissal of Curling vs. Raffensperger Election Ruling appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.