While Bitcoin’s December descent triggered an 80% collapse in Strategy Inc.’s (previously known as Microstrategy) leveraged ETFs, erasing $1.5 billion in retail savings from MSTX and MSTU.
Yet MSTR stock surged 6.05% on Tuesday, highlighting a stark divergence fueled by the unforgiving math of leverage and compounding decay.
The two moved in opposite directions despite tracking the same underlying asset, offering a masterclass in why leverage kills retail traders.
As Bitcoin fell 30% from October highs to trade near $90,000, leveraged products designed to amplify daily moves imploded through daily rebalancing, while MSTR’s straightforward corporate Bitcoin holdings proved oddly resilient.
The contrast wasn’t an accident; it revealed how different capital structures, leverage ratios, and investor bases react when volatility spikes.
Why leveraged products blew up while MSTR broke higher
The math is brutal and mechanical. MSTX and MSTU aim to deliver twice MSTR’s daily return through derivatives and leverage.
On a day when Bitcoin fell, these funds didn’t just lose half as much as MSTR; they lost more.
A 50% Bitcoin decline doesn’t create a 100% ETF loss; it can wipe out an entire position through compounding called volatility decay.
Each evening, fund managers rebalance: if the underlying stock crashes, they’re forced to sell winners and buy losers at the worst prices, locking in damage.
By contrast, MSTR holds Bitcoin directly on its balance sheet, no derivatives, no daily rebalancing, no synthetic leverage.
When Bitcoin fell, MSTR fell too, but the company’s market net asset value (mNAV) ratio, enterprise value divided by Bitcoin holdings, actually stabilised at 1.17 after hitting that danger zone.
The newly announced $1.44 billion cash reserve, covering 21 months of dividend payments, removed immediate forced-sale fears.
For tactical traders and hedge funds seeking short-term reversal plays, MSTR looked oversold on Tuesday, with RSI in the mid-20s and the stock at critical support levels, attracting short covering and bargain hunting.
MSTR rose because it’s structurally different, a leveraged Bitcoin play via corporate engineering rather than derivative mechanics.
That Tuesday’s rebound was fueled by oversold bounces, short covering, and rotation away from ETF products that destroyed capital.
Can Saylor’s playbook outlast the volatility?
The divergence hints at a potential inflection point in how retail approaches crypto exposure.
MSTX, MSTU, and MSTP, once darlings of retail traders hunting 2x returns, have lost over 80% combined in 2025.
Assets under management fell from $2.3 billion to $830 million. That level of destruction often triggers a rotation: retail money flows out of levered products into simpler exposures like spot Bitcoin or MSTR.
Yet MSTR remains a highly controversial, leveraged bet itself, just via equity issuance and debt rather than derivatives.
Regulators are watching closely. The SEC has long warned that leveraged single-stock ETFs pose outsized risks to retail investors, particularly when ownership of already-speculative holdings like MSTR compounds through 2x leverage.
MSTR’s Tuesday pop may signal a tactical bounce for opportunistic traders, or it could mark the start of a genuine rotation away from derivative-heavy products toward corporate holdings.
Whether Saylor’s model can sustain through the next volatility cycle, and whether retail finally heeds the warnings about leverage, remains the $40 billion question.
The post Strategy ETFs crash 80% amid BTC turmoil, MSTR gains 6% in surprising divergence appeared first on Invezz