High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Politics

BOOM: Julie Kelly Catches Radical Pro-Illegal Alien Obama Judge in a Big Setup Against Trump After Uncovering a Bombshell Revelation in Court Transcript

by April 6, 2025
April 6, 2025

Judge James Boasberg / screen image

On Saturday, conservative journalist and warrior for justice Julie Kelly uncovered a bombshell in the transcript from Thursday’s hearing in a radical District judge’s courtroom regarding whether the Trump Administration has the authority under the Alien Enemies Act to deport violent illegal aliens.

As Jim Hoft previously reported, Judge James Boasberg, who is running a coup-d-etat of the executive branch, is considering holding Trump officials in contempt for not turning planes around mid-flight and returning over one hundred killers, gangsters, r*pists, and other criminal illegals back to the US.

Judge Boasberg, an Obama appointee, implemented a temporary restraining order (TRO) on Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to deport criminal aliens last month, calling it, “incredibly troublesome and problematic.” He then extended his block last week, arguing the plaintiffs suing the Trump administration need more time to file motions and prepare arguments.

Kelly predicted back in March that Boasberg was attempting to set a contempt trap for Trump officials. Now, she has proof that Boasberg slyly positioned himself to get assigned to this immigration case so he could implement his sinister scheme.

“I have just received the (purchased) transcript from Thursday’s hearing before Judge Boasberg,” Kelly wrote on X. “Lots of good stuff, especially as I develop a fuller timeline of what went down behind the scenes on March 15.”

Then Kelly pointed out something incredibly damning.

“This really caught my eye,” she noted. “Remember the whole “THESE CASES ARE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED” bit by Boasberg and others?”

“No one really believes this…right?” Kelly added. “Also, during the start of the 5 p.m. Zoom hearing on March 15, Boasberg apologized for his casual dress, saying he had gone “away” for the weekend and did not bring a tie or his robe.”

LOOK:

Credit: Julie Kelly X

“He knew this case was coming. He wanted this case,” Kelly wrote. “He wanted to stop the deportations and most importantly–he wanted to set a contempt trap for the Trump administration.”

As PJ Media notes, Boasberg’s true goal was usurping control over Trump’s legal authority on the matter of immigration and foreign policy. Boasberg was furious that the Trump administration decided to enforce the Alien Enemies Act to carry out deportations of illegal alien r*pists, murders, and gang members without his consent.

“This is not judicial restraint or a careful balance of powers,” Kelly said. “This is Boasberg giving away the notion that the executive branch should WAIT FOR APPROVAL from the judicial branch before taking action on matters clearly under the purview of the presidency, including foreign policy and diplomacy.”

“Boasberg knew throughout the day that ICE was rounding up the TdA gang bangers covered by the proclamation,” she added. “So he rushed not only to convert the initial lawsuit into a class but entered a second temporary restraining order prohibiting their removal and absurdly demanding the return of planes carrying the illegals.”

Kelly also uncovered a particularly troubling exchange involving Boasberg and one of DOJ’s lawyers. The ‘judge’ demanded answers from a DOJ attorney regarding which Trump officials were listening to his 5 p.m. hearing as if that is any of his business.

One set of exchanges during Thursday’s hearing I believed was way out of line for Boasberg was his interrogation of DOJ atty Drew Ensign over which Trump officials were listening to the 5pm hearing on March 15.

On what basis can he demand those answers? pic.twitter.com/8wrNN766Y0

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 5, 2025

The Gateway Pundit previously reported Boasberg has so far been assigned to FOUR cases concerning the Trump Administration.

Federal district courts usually assign cases to judges through a random selection process to ensure impartiality and prevent “judge shopping,” where litigants might attempt to have their cases heard by a particular judge perceived as favorable. According to the Federal Bar Association, this practice is designed to uphold the integrity and fairness of the judicial system.

Now, we all know he has been scheming to position himself on one case. It’s likely he has done so for the other three as well.

The post BOOM: Julie Kelly Catches Radical Pro-Illegal Alien Obama Judge in a Big Setup Against Trump After Uncovering a Bombshell Revelation in Court Transcript appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

previous post
Peter Navarro Defends Trump’s Tariffs – “We’ve Given Away Our Houses, Our Office Buildings, Our Food Supply, Our Farmland” (VIDEO)
next post
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Completely Wrecks CBS’s Margaret Brennan After She Makes an Absurd Accusation Regarding Trump’s Tariff Strategy (VIDEO)

You may also like

Muslim Immigrant Recruited For Jihad in Chicago

June 30, 2025

Absurd! Smith College Offers $5K Course for Teens...

June 30, 2025

Notorious Melania Hater Allegedly Stepping Down: Could First...

June 30, 2025

Palantir Co-founder Peter Thiel Discusses The Antichrist and...

June 30, 2025

Massachusetts Woman Records Unidentified Object Falling From the...

June 30, 2025

Teachers’ Union Chief Randi Weingarten Accidentally Makes the...

June 30, 2025

Officials Erased from Existing Photos After North Korea’s...

June 30, 2025

Senator Markwayne Mullin Delivers Common Sense On Medicaid...

June 30, 2025

Study: ‘More Diversity of Thought on the Political...

June 30, 2025

Muslim Communist Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani Says Illegal...

June 30, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    June 27, 2025
  • Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    June 27, 2025
  • The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    June 27, 2025
  • Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

    June 27, 2025
  • Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

    June 27, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 highyieldmarkets.com | All Rights Reserved

High Yield Markets
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick